It Isn’t Legal for You to Vote, so Don’t

By Rod Morse

It isn’t legal for you to vote, so don’t do it.  Is that a radical and racist idea, or is it the heart of a representative republic?  The question is both timely and important given the evidence of widespread voter fraud we saw in the last election. Doctor John Lott has a modest proposal to stop voter fraud.  We have the solution..or do we?





New Hampshire has same day voter registration.  We recently found that over five thousand people crossed into New Hampshire on election day to cast their votes in the 2016 election.  These voters never became residents or registered their cars in New Hampshire.  The votes were probably illegal, and Doctor Lott has a solution.

Illegal voting wouldn’t matter except for the fact that the last presidential election in New Hampshire was won by only 2700 votes.  The election for US senate was won by less than 1100 votes.  The election is probably fraudulent as it stands.  Yes, I said that the New Hampshire Secretary of State certified a fraudulent outcome.  He is a Democrat.  This continuing voter fraud in New Hampshire  is part of a larger pattern that extends from coast to coast.

Many elections were won by ghost voters. We had several counties in California, Illinois, and Florida where there were more votes cast than there were registered voters.  While a legal possibility, it is virtually impossible with a total voter turnout of only 58 percent.  The California counties with voter irregularities are much like the evidence we saw in New Hampshire.  Out of state activists can register to vote on election day.  They can vote in their state as well as voting in several California counties.  They did, and the California legislature kept its Democrat super-majority.  There is no risk of prosecution since the California Attorney General and the California Secretary of State are Democrats.  Buying elections is the perfect crime.

“There is nothing to see here.  Move along.”

Doctor Lott’s solution is simple.  We already have a national instant background check system in place.  We’ve already litigated the use of this system.  Scores of judges already ruled that this background check does not infringe on our constitutional rights.  This is the background check system we use when an honest citizen buys a firearm.  It wasn’t an infringement when I had to use it..or so I was told.


Democrats told us that the instant background check system is necessary to keep felons and illegals from buying guns.  States use a similar system to stop people from buying more than one gun a month.  We can use these background check systems today to keep illegals from voting and to keep US citizens from voting more than once.

Or can we?  We clearly have a double standard here.  Politicians infringe on the rights of honest citizens as the politician feigns great concern that illegals might get a gun.  The same politicians look the other way while millions of illegal votes decide elections.  This isn’t a trivial matter as political fortunes are made and lost.





Power and political influence are at stake given the monumental size and power of government.  We have trillion dollar budgets which means that billions of dollars in political favors are at stake.  Billionaires toss around tens of millions of dollars to buy the election results they want.

You are the only person who can stop them.  Drop the dime on your congressman and stop this voter fraud today.  Why, we already have the systems in place to do it.  You have both a phone, and we have an instant background check system.

Source

Related posts

Why We Continue to Have School Murders

Rob Morse

Disarming the Victim- The Latest Shots in the Democrat’s War on Women

Rob Morse

No, Trump Didn’t ‘Crack Down’ on a Rutgers Professor

TheWeeklyCaller